Work · Community report
Build a leads list from your network
A single post on X reports that Muse built a leads list by comparing one person's Instagram and LinkedIn network with their email conversations. No count, format or matching rule is given, so this guide offers a prompt that spells out what counts as a lead and what the list should contain.
What you can get
What it is
Leads list
A leads list of contacts drawn from your Instagram and LinkedIn network who also show up in your email conversations; the report does not state how many names this produced or in what format.
It came back right when
- Each entry states how the contact was identified (Instagram, LinkedIn, or both) and the connection to an email exchange.
- No contact is added without a traceable reason for the match.
- The list is handed to you for review, not used for outreach automatically.
The checks are editorial, not from the source.
- Define a matchStops for your approval
State what counts as a lead: a social connection with an actual email exchange, or a looser signal.
- Connect accounts
Give access to Instagram, LinkedIn and email so the comparison can run.
- Build and explain the list
Have it list each match with how the contact is known and the matching reason.
- Review before outreachStops for your approval
Check each entry for accuracy and decide separately who gets contacted.
Editorial, not from the source
Works when
- You want to find people you already know, rather than cold contacts, for outreach.
- You are comfortable connecting your social accounts and email for this comparison.
- You can review the list for accuracy before acting on it.
Does not work when
- You need a large, ranked list with confidence scores; the report gives no detail on ranking.
- Your social handles and email identities differ enough that matching could be unreliable.
- You want new leads outside your existing network; this task only surfaces people you already know.
Network leads list: review template
| Contact | How matched | Status |
|---|---|---|
| [Name] | [Instagram/LinkedIn + email exchange] | [Confirmed real contact] |
| [Name] | [Matching signal used] | [Needs verification] |
| [Name] | [Last email topic] | [Approved for outreach] |
The source case
On X, @AlecEllin lists several tasks completed in a week, one of which is that Muse 'built a leads list based on my Instagram and LinkedIn network compared with my email convos.' No detail is given on how many leads were found, how the list was formatted, or what criteria decided a match between a social contact and an email conversation. This is one individual report, checked on 2026-10-09, describing that the list was built, not a specific count or quality of leads. @DaveSchoools reports on X that Muse analyzed his 7k LinkedIn connections to find intros into key accounts, but the post does not say how many intros it found, whether any led anywhere, or whether email history or Instagram was part of the comparison.
A public report by someone outside this library. Not independently reproduced here.
From the source
Source excerpt
built a leads list based on my Instagram and LinkedIn network compared with my email convos
Source excerpt
Muse analyzed my 7k LinkedIn connections to find intros into key accounts.
Quoted from the original posts. Not written by this guide, and not a result produced here.
Suggested prompt
Bring Access credentials or connections for Instagram, LinkedIn and your email account, What counts as a usable match between a social contact and an email contact. Acts Reads your Instagram and LinkedIn network and your email conversation history. Produces a list for your review; it does not message any contact on the list without your separate instruction. Source community report, checked 2026-10-21.
Written by this guide as a starting point, not quoted from the source. Your edits stay in this browser.
Other ways to ask
Editorial rewrites of the brief above, for a different emphasis. Copy them separately.
What you need
Editorial, not from the source
You supply
- Access credentials or connections for Instagram, LinkedIn and your email account
- What counts as a usable match between a social contact and an email contact
Connected
- Your Instagram account
- Your LinkedIn account
- Your email account
Approved by you
- Your approval before the list is used for any outreach
How to try it
Editorial, not from the source
- Give the agent access to your Instagram and LinkedIn network and your email conversation history.
- Tell it what counts as a match worth listing: for example, someone you have both connected with socially and actually emailed, not just a mutual follow.
- Have it build a list that names each contact, how you know them (Instagram, LinkedIn, or both), and the gist of your last email exchange with them.
- Review the list for anyone it included or left out incorrectly before you use it for outreach.
Decide what counts as a lead before you start
A leads list built from your own network is only useful if it reflects relationships you would actually act on. Before connecting any accounts, decide what should count as a match: someone you follow on Instagram and have also emailed, someone connected on LinkedIn with a recent exchange, or both. A mutual follow with no real conversation is a weaker signal than an exchange of actual emails, so say which signals matter more. If you are building this list for a specific purpose, such as a product launch or a job search, say that too, since it changes which contacts are worth surfacing. Without this upfront direction, the agent is left guessing at a threshold, and a guessed threshold either buries real contacts in noise or misses people who do not fit a default pattern.
Expect thin detail on matching, and check it
The only available report of this task states that a leads list was built by comparing a social network against email conversations, with no detail on how many names resulted or how matches were confirmed. That gap matters most when names or handles differ between platforms, since a mismatch can either create a false connection between two different people or miss a real one entirely. Ask the agent to show its reasoning for each match, not just the final name, so you can catch cases where a similar name or a shared employer created a false positive. Treat the first version of the list as a draft to review line by line rather than a finished, ready-to-use export, especially before using it for any outreach that depends on genuinely knowing the person.
Keep outreach separate from the list itself
Building the list and acting on it are two different steps, and conflating them risks messaging someone based on a match that turned out to be wrong. Once the list is built, review it for accuracy, then decide separately which contacts are worth reaching out to and in what order. Keep a record of how you know each contact in the author's own terms, such as 'connected on LinkedIn in 2024' or 'last emailed about a project in spring,' so outreach can reference something specific rather than a generic opener. If you plan to pair this list with a sales outreach pack or similar follow-up, treat the leads list as the input to review first, not a finished target list ready to contact.
Open Muse to try it. That is the product's own site; this guide is not part of it.
Limits and confirmation points
Limits to confirm
- One individual report states a contact list was built this way; it does not say how many leads resulted, how they were ranked, or in what format the list was delivered.
- No detail is given on how it decided a social contact and an email contact were the same person, which matters if names or handles differ.
- This directory has not run this task itself and cannot confirm how it behaves with a large network or a long email history.
Stop and check
Editorial, not from the source
- Before it starts: confirm which accounts it can read and what counts as a valid match.
- Before you use the list: review names for accuracy and relevance.
- Before any outreach: decide separately who on the list actually gets contacted.
If it goes wrong
Editorial, not from the source
- The list includes someone you don't actually know well
- Check how the match was made; a shared mutual connection or a similar name can produce a false match that needs to be removed manually.
- A contact you expected is missing
- Check whether your email history with them uses a different address or name than their social profile; mismatched identities are not detailed in the available report.
- You're not sure the list is complete
- No report states how large a network or email history this was tested against; treat the first list as a draft and ask it to re-check against a wider date range if needed.
Common questions
What does it need access to for a leads list like this?
Your Instagram and LinkedIn network and your email conversation history, so it can compare who you know socially against who you've actually emailed.
How many leads will this produce?
The only available report does not say. Treat the first list as a draft and expect to review it rather than relying on a specific count.
How does it decide two accounts belong to the same person?
This isn't detailed in the available report. Ask it to show its reasoning for each match so you can catch a false match from a similar name or shared employer.
Will it contact people on the list for me?
No report describes this. Treat the list as something to review first, and decide separately who gets reached out to.
Is this the same as a sales outreach pack?
No. A leads list identifies who to consider contacting; an outreach pack writes the messages. Build and review the list first, then decide on outreach separately.
Next
Related to this task
More in Work
Similar tasks
Get recurring task recommendations — ask your own agent to check for relevant updates.